<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gulu&#8217;s Googlies: BCCI &#8211; The Board of Control ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cricket.butjazz.com/gulu-ezekiel-weekly-cricket-column-bcci/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cricket.butjazz.com/gulu-ezekiel-weekly-cricket-column-bcci/</link>
	<description>All about Cricket</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gulu's Googlies &#124; Gulu's Weekly Cricket Column &#124; BCCI A Charitable Trust &#124; Cricket</title>
		<link>http://cricket.butjazz.com/gulu-ezekiel-weekly-cricket-column-bcci/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Gulu's Googlies &#124; Gulu's Weekly Cricket Column &#124; BCCI A Charitable Trust &#124; Cricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cricket.butjazz.com/?p=299#comment-102</guid>
		<description>[...] game and has done nothing to improve the infrastructure is a vindication of the comments I made in my first column, well before these startling revelations became [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] game and has done nothing to improve the infrastructure is a vindication of the comments I made in my first column, well before these startling revelations became [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BCCI: Board of Control for T20 &#38; One Day Cricket Only? &#124; Cricket</title>
		<link>http://cricket.butjazz.com/gulu-ezekiel-weekly-cricket-column-bcci/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>BCCI: Board of Control for T20 &#38; One Day Cricket Only? &#124; Cricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cricket.butjazz.com/?p=299#comment-82</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote in my first column last week, the abysmal condition of our stadiums is a major factor in keeping fans away from attending five [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote in my first column last week, the abysmal condition of our stadiums is a major factor in keeping fans away from attending five [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer</title>
		<link>http://cricket.butjazz.com/gulu-ezekiel-weekly-cricket-column-bcci/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Homer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cricket.butjazz.com/?p=299#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Anythingbutjazz,

My point is not to demean or diminish the author. My point is that the author, more than others,  will be cognizant of the fact that organizations bungle. All the time. Some bunglings lead to financial ruin, others to cases of mismanagement.

Does commercial success translate to respectable or good - depends on how you define respectable or good.

And you can be good, respectable and a commercial success - the three qualities are not mutually exclusive.

Cheers,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anythingbutjazz,</p>
<p>My point is not to demean or diminish the author. My point is that the author, more than others,  will be cognizant of the fact that organizations bungle. All the time. Some bunglings lead to financial ruin, others to cases of mismanagement.</p>
<p>Does commercial success translate to respectable or good &#8211; depends on how you define respectable or good.</p>
<p>And you can be good, respectable and a commercial success &#8211; the three qualities are not mutually exclusive.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anythingbutjazz</title>
		<link>http://cricket.butjazz.com/gulu-ezekiel-weekly-cricket-column-bcci/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>anythingbutjazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cricket.butjazz.com/?p=299#comment-74</guid>
		<description>&quot;Of the many publications that the author has worked with, how many have shut shop?&quot; - Homer, that was surely uncalled for - and very ungentlemanly. 

There are many a great publications that failed to succeed commercially and had to shut shop. Does that mean that they were not respectable or good? In fact, Cricinfo shut down its monthly magazine not too long back in history. The Indian Express may be struggling commercially and the Hindu may not be as big as the Times of India, but the biggest commercial successes are not always the finest, are they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Of the many publications that the author has worked with, how many have shut shop?&#8221; &#8211; Homer, that was surely uncalled for &#8211; and very ungentlemanly. </p>
<p>There are many a great publications that failed to succeed commercially and had to shut shop. Does that mean that they were not respectable or good? In fact, Cricinfo shut down its monthly magazine not too long back in history. The Indian Express may be struggling commercially and the Hindu may not be as big as the Times of India, but the biggest commercial successes are not always the finest, are they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
